Immediate Safety Priority
The first nursing action must address the person at greatest immediate physical risk. In this scenario, the son is experiencing
command hallucinations—auditory hallucinations that direct him to harm a specific, identified person (his sister). He also has access to a weapon: a large knife under the mattress on which he is sitting. The sister is only a few steps away in the kitchen. Because the threat is directed at a named individual who is physically nearby, the highest-priority intervention is to remove that potential victim from the environment without delay.
Command hallucinations to harm a named person, combined with a weapon within reach, constitute a psychiatric safety emergency requiring immediate separation of the potential victim from the patient. The nurse should ask the mother to take the sister out of the house now. This action does not require confronting the son, does not involve reaching for the weapon, and immediately reduces the risk of harm to the sister.
Watch out! Asking the son to hand over the knife may seem logical, but it risks escalating the situation. The son is sitting on the mattress where the knife is hidden, and any attempt to retrieve it could be perceived as a threat, triggering agitation or violence. Weapon removal is done with assistance and after the immediate victim is safe.
Why Not the Other Options First?
| Option | Why It Is Not the First Action |
|---|
| 1. Stay and keep him talking calmly | Maintaining verbal engagement is important, but it does not remove the sister from immediate danger. The nurse can continue talking after the sister is out of the house. |
| 2. Ask him to give the knife | Directly requesting the weapon while he is sitting on it risks confrontation and escalation. This is done with help and after the victim is safe. |
| 4. Call the RHU physician for emergency evaluation | Emergency evaluation is necessary, but it takes time to arrange. The sister's safety cannot wait for a phone call or transport arrangement. |
Clinical Reasoning and Risk Assessment
Structured professional judgment tools, such as
V-RISK-10, are used in psychiatric settings to screen for violence risk. Research on multidisciplinary use of V-RISK-10 in psychosis wards highlights that risk assessment is most effective when it links directly to risk management—meaning the assessment must lead to concrete protective actions
[1]. In this community setting, the protective action that can be implemented fastest is removing the sister from the home.
The presence of a specific victim named in the hallucination is a particularly concerning feature. Community-based studies of psychiatric emergencies among patients with severe mental disorders show that emergency interventions are often triggered by acute symptom exacerbations that create immediate danger to self or others . The son's calm demeanor does not reduce risk; individuals experiencing command hallucinations may comply with the commands without visible agitation.
The nurse's first responsibility is to protect the identified potential victim, not to negotiate with the patient or retrieve the weapon. Once the sister is out of the house, the nurse can remain with the son, maintain calm communication, and arrange for emergency psychiatric evaluation and safe weapon removal with additional help.
Applying the Nursing Process
In the
assessment phase, the nurse identifies that the son has command hallucinations to harm his sister, access to a weapon, and the sister is nearby. The
nursing diagnosis is
Risk for Violence: Other-Directed related to command hallucinations and weapon access. The
planning phase prioritizes immediate victim safety. The
implementation begins with removing the sister from the environment, followed by maintaining a calm presence, arranging emergency evaluation, and coordinating safe weapon removal with assistance.
Evaluation includes confirming the sister is safe, the son remains calm, and emergency services are en route.
Key point! In any situation involving a threat to a specific person, the first nursing action is always to protect the potential victim. Only after the victim is safe does the nurse address the patient's immediate psychiatric needs and arrange for further evaluation and intervention.
References (research sources)
- [1]
Better safe than sorry - a qualitative study of multidisciplinary use of the V-RISK-10 in assessing patients with psychosis.Research articleSeierstad A, Bruu BK, Schjøtt-Pedersen O, Løvgren A, Lockertsen Ø. (2025) · DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1561082