Scenario analysis
The family has already demonstrated three of the four prerequisites for using a community service. The mother knows the free therapy sessions exist, she has physically reached the facility before, and she explicitly states that “the sessions were helping him.” Therefore, lack of knowledge, inaccessibility, and failure to perceive benefit are not the operative barriers. What changed is her willingness to return after being publicly reprimanded by a staff member in front of other mothers.
In community health nursing, utilization of a resource depends not only on availability and perceived value but also on the therapeutic relationship between the family and the service provider. A single negative interpersonal encounter can outweigh objective benefits, particularly when the caregiver is already under strain. This mother is the sole caregiver for a child with cerebral palsy and a toddler, and the father’s upcoming departure for two years will further reduce her support. Her decision to stop attending is a protective response to humiliation, not a misunderstanding of the service’s purpose.
Key point! The correct answer is 2 because the barrier is emotional and relational, not informational, geographic, or financial. The nursing intervention must therefore target restoring trust—for example, by coordinating with the health center to arrange a respectful re-entry, clarifying the lateness policy privately, or assigning a different staff member—rather than providing more teaching about the service.
| Option | Why it is not the best explanation |
|---|---|
| 1. Lack of knowledge | The mother names the service, its location, and its schedule; she has attended previously. |
| 3. Failure to see benefits | She states the sessions “were helping him,” so perceived benefit is intact. |
| 4. Inaccessibility | Distance and cost are not mentioned as barriers; she reached the center before. |
| 2. Unpleasant experience | The scolding in front of peers created shame and eroded trust, which is the actual reason for refusal. |
The family’s physical environment—two entrance steps and raised door thresholds—does present real accessibility challenges for a wheelchair user. However, the mother’s stated reason for discontinuing therapy is not architectural; it is interpersonal. A thorough public health nurse assessment would note both issues, but the question asks for the best explanation of the family’s inability to use the resource, and the mother’s own words point directly to the humiliating encounter.
Watch out! In licensure examinations, when a scenario includes multiple potential problems, the correct answer is the one that matches the client’s stated reason or the most immediate modifiable barrier. Do not select a structural issue such as steps or cost when the client has clearly identified a relational one.
From a nursing process perspective, this finding belongs in the assessment phase and informs the diagnosis of ineffective family health management or impaired verbal communication between family and provider. The planning phase would prioritize rebuilding a collaborative relationship with the health center, because without trust, even the most evidence-based therapy program cannot be delivered.
When a family stops attending a service they previously used and valued, assess for interpersonal or emotional barriers before assuming lack of knowledge or access. A single humiliating encounter with staff can override objective benefits, especially for caregivers under high strain.
The public health nurse should first acknowledge the mother's experience without defensiveness, then coordinate with the health center to arrange a respectful re-entry. Options include clarifying lateness policies privately, assigning a different staff member, or scheduling a less crowded time slot.
Do not respond with more teaching about the service or dismiss the incident as minor. The barrier is relational, not informational. Rebuilding trust must precede any attempt to re-engage the family in therapy.
학습 참고용입니다. 실제 임상은 최신 지침과 소속 기관 프로토콜을 따르세요.