Understanding the Child’s Needs
A 10-year-old child with a mild intellectual disability processes information best when it is presented in a concrete, literal manner. Abstract medical concepts or lengthy verbal explanations can be overwhelming and increase anxiety. The systematic review by Suna et al. highlights the critical importance of tailoring healthcare communication to the developmental and cognitive needs of the child, emphasizing that effective pediatric interventions must reflect the specific needs and preferences of patients and families
[1]. For a child with an intellectual disability, this means breaking down the surgical experience into manageable, tangible steps.
Why Option 1 is Correct
Using
simple, concrete language and
visual aids directly aligns with the principles of developmentally appropriate communication. This approach translates the abstract and potentially frightening concept of "surgery" into a sequence of understandable events (e.g., "You will wear special pajamas," "You will breathe sleepy air through a mask," "You will wake up with a bandage"). The scoping review by MacKay et al. identifies
informational support as a key domain of psychosocial care for hospitalized children, noting that it must be adapted to the child’s cognitive level to be effective
[2]. Visual aids like picture books, dolls, or simple diagrams serve as concrete references, reducing fear of the unknown and fostering a sense of predictability and control, which is essential for coping.
Analysis of Incorrect Options
-
Option 2: Providing
detailed medical explanations is counterproductive. Abstract terminology and complex pathophysiological details exceed the cognitive processing capacity of a child with an intellectual disability. This approach can lead to confusion, misinterpretation, and heightened anxiety, contradicting the evidence that informational support must be tailored to the recipient's ability to understand
[2].
-
Option 3: Avoiding discussion of the surgery is a nontherapeutic communication technique. Children are highly perceptive and will sense the tension and secrecy. Lack of information creates a void that is often filled with fear and catastrophic fantasies, which can be more damaging than a simple, honest explanation. This directly opposes the principle of providing appropriate emotional and informational support to mitigate the stress of hospitalization
[2].
-
Option 4: Delegating the entire explanation to the
parents is an abdication of the nurse’s professional responsibility. While parents are vital partners in care, as underscored by the emphasis on parental engagement in co-design
[1], the nurse possesses the clinical knowledge to frame the surgical process accurately and the therapeutic communication skills to deliver it effectively. The appropriate intervention is a collaborative one, where the nurse leads the explanation with developmentally appropriate methods and reinforces the parents' supportive role.
Integrating the Evidence into Practice
The most effective nursing intervention synthesizes the core findings from the provided evidence. It involves a co-design mindset by partnering with the parent to understand the child’s specific communication style and preferences
[1], while the nurse actively delivers structured, multimodal psychosocial support. The nurse provides the
informational support through concrete, step-by-step teaching with visual aids and simultaneously offers
emotional support by creating a safe, honest, and predictable environment
[2]. This combination directly addresses the child’s cognitive needs and reduces the psychological distress associated with an unfamiliar and invasive hospital experience.
References (research sources)
- [1]
Evaluating co-design approaches with parents in paediatric healthcare: a systematic review.Meta-analysis/systematic reviewSuna J, Tanti D, Merlo G, Bryant P, McMullan B, Hall L, HOMEFREE Study Group. (2025) · DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-13495-x
- [2]
Supporting Children With a Chronic Disease and Their Parents When Admitted to Hospital: A Scoping Review of Psychosocial Supports.Research articleMacKay LJ, Lagrisolal N, Chang U, Christoffersen M, Hayden KA, Birnie K, Dewan T. (2026) · DOI: 10.1111/apa.70492