第6階段 — 評估結果。回顧隔離、診斷、治療和暴露後追蹤的時間軸,並回答三個結果問題。 | MyMerci
還有更多這樣的題目挑戰 ›
Standard/Transmission-Based Precautions/Surgical Asepsis

第6階段 — 評估結果。回顧隔離、診斷、治療和暴露後追蹤的時間軸,並回答三個結果問題。

Trend

選擇作答後,查看答案。

TimeData
0700 — RecognitionThree-week cough with blood-streaked sputum, weight loss, night sweats, recent infectious TB contact, and a cavitary right-upper-lobe lesion are recognized after six hours in a non-AIIR room.在非負壓隔離病房 (non-AIIR) 停留六小時後,發現個案有三週咳嗽帶血絲痰、體重減輕、夜間盜汗、近期接觸傳染性結核病患者,以及右上肺葉空洞性病變。
0710 to 0810 — ContainmentThe client is masked, the door is closed, entry is limited, qualified personnel use fit-tested N95 or higher protection, and AIIR transfer is completed without another unprotected entry.個案戴上口罩,房門關閉,限制進入,合格人員使用密合度測試合格的 N95 或更高防護等級的口罩,並在沒有其他未受保護人員進入的情況下完成轉移至負壓隔離病房 (AIIR)。
1100 — Diagnostic and treatment responseFirst sputum is AFB-smear 3+ and NAAT-positive for M. tuberculosis complex. Culture and susceptibility testing are pending. The TB clinician starts an appropriate multidrug regimen after specimens are obtained.第一份痰液抗酸桿菌 (AFB) 塗片呈 3+ 陽性,結核分枝桿菌複合群核酸擴增檢測 (NAAT) 呈陽性。培養和藥敏試驗結果待定。結核病臨床醫師在取得檢體後開始適當的多重藥物治療方案。
48 hours — Isolation reviewThree specimens were collected 8 to 24 hours apart, including one early-morning specimen. Two smears are positive and the third is pending. Cough persists, and no alternative diagnosis explains the syndrome.收集了三份檢體,間隔 8 至 24 小時,其中包括一份清晨檢體。兩份塗片呈陽性,第三份待定。咳嗽持續,且沒有其他診斷可以解釋此症候群。
48 hours — Exposure follow-upThe chemotherapy recipient and 3-year-old child receive prompt medical evaluation. Healthcare personnel receive symptom screens; previously negative personnel are tested now and scheduled for repeat testing 8 to 10 weeks after last exposure if the first test is negative. Prior-positive personnel receive symptom evaluation rather than automatic retesting.化療接受者和 3 歲兒童接受及時醫療評估。醫護人員接受症狀篩查;先前檢測結果為陰性的人員現在進行檢測,如果首次檢測結果為陰性,則安排在最後一次暴露後 8 到 10 週重複檢測。先前檢測結果為陽性的人員接受症狀評估,而不是自動重複檢測。

Q1. Which isolation evaluation is most accurate at 48 hours?48 小時後,哪項隔離評估最準確?

Q2. Which finding best shows that healthcare-personnel follow-up is correctly structured?哪項發現最能顯示醫護人員的追蹤結構正確?

Q3. Which interpretation of the diagnostic and treatment response is most accurate?哪項對診斷和治療反應的解釋最準確?

解析
結果評估
空氣傳播防護措施必須繼續,因為個案仍有症狀,兩份塗片呈陽性,第三份待定,且沒有其他診斷可以解釋此症候群。當免疫功能低下的室友和幼兒接受及時評估,且醫護人員的追蹤反映了先前的檢測歷史時,調查是適當的基於風險的。對於先前檢測結果為陰性的醫護人員,應立即進行檢測,如果最初結果為陰性,則在最後一次暴露後 8 到 10 週重複檢測,以結束檢測窗口。核酸擴增檢測 (NAAT) 支持快速診斷,但不能取代確定性治療方案所需的培養和藥敏結果。
相同主題的下一題A nurse is caring for a client newly admitted with suspected methicillin-resistant Staphyl…本題收錄於此題庫[전통+신유형] NCLEX LEVEL UP 패키지KRW 79,000
瀏覽全部題目 無需登入

用 MyMerci 全面準備 NCLEX-RN

數千道附詳細解析的 NCLEX 題型,以你的語言呈現。追蹤學習進度,讀得更聰明。

免費開始

僅供學習參考。實際臨床請遵循最新指引與所屬機構規範。