階段 6 — 評估結果。審查語言近用、自我管理和後續追蹤的時間軸,並回答三個結果問題。 | MyMerci
還有更多這樣的題目挑戰 ›
Assignment/Delegation/Supervision

階段 6 — 評估結果。審查語言近用、自我管理和後續追蹤的時間軸,並回答三個結果問題。

Trend

選擇作答後,查看答案。

TimeData
Admission — Inadequate language accessThe adult son interprets after staff decide not to wait 30 minutes. English treatment and rights documents are completed without documented qualified interpretation or demonstrated patient understanding.在工作人員決定不等待30分鐘後,成年兒子進行口譯。英文治療和權利文件在沒有記錄合格口譯或證明個案理解的情況下完成。
Discharge morning — Risk recognizedMrs. L gives vague yes responses, the son summarizes instead of interpreting her explanation, and no independent insulin or meter demonstration is documented. Discharge teaching is paused.L女士給出模糊的「是」回應,兒子總結而非口譯她的解釋,且沒有記錄獨立的胰島素或血糖機示範。出院教學暫停。
Qualified-interpreter session — Plan reconciledMrs. L privately requests a qualified Vietnamese interpreter and later invites her son as support. Prescriptions, supplies, and supplements are reconciled; unverified herbal products remain on hold pending product-specific review.L女士私下要求一位合格的越南語口譯員,之後邀請她的兒子作為支持。處方、用品和補充劑已協調;未經證實的草藥產品仍暫停使用,待產品特定審查。
Before discharge — Teach-back repairedMrs. L initially confuses the glargine and lispro pens. After reteaching, she independently identifies both products, demonstrates the prescribed doses and meter use, coordinates lispro with eating, and explains the low-glucose response and contacts.L女士最初混淆了glargine和lispro胰島素筆。重新教學後,她獨立辨識出兩種產品,示範了規定的劑量和血糖機使用,將lispro與進食協調,並解釋了低血糖反應和聯絡方式。
48 hours — Accessible follow-upDuring a qualified-interpreter-supported call, Mrs. L reads back her log, reports no value below 70 mg/dL, applies the individualized meal-related instruction correctly, and confirms the pharmacist-review appointment.在由合格口譯員協助的電話中,L女士讀回她的記錄,報告沒有低於70 mg/dL的數值,正確應用了個人化的餐食相關指示,並確認了藥師審查預約。

Q1. Which finding best supports discharge readiness?哪項發現最能支持出院準備就緒?

Q2. Which interpretation of the 48-hour follow-up is most accurate?對48小時後續追蹤的哪種解釋最準確?

Q3. Which system response best addresses the failure identified at admission?哪種系統回應最能解決入院時發現的失敗?

解析
結果評估
此回應是有效的,因為L女士透過合格口譯員直接參與,最初的胰島素筆辨識錯誤觸發了重新教學,之後她獨立示範了血糖機、劑量、時間和低血糖反應。48小時後,她應用了個人化計畫,並安排了補充劑審查。單憑越南語講義或簽名並不能確立準備就緒。系統改進應及早記錄偏好語言、迅速提供合格的口譯方式、支援可靠的翻譯高風險材料,並審核口譯員的使用和回覆教學,而不是強制要求家屬口譯或使用通用雙語表格。
相同主題的下一題A 67-year-old client with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease attends a routine primary …本題收錄於此題庫[전통+신유형] NCLEX LEVEL UP 패키지KRW 79,000
瀏覽全部題目 無需登入

用 MyMerci 全面準備 NCLEX-RN

數千道附詳細解析的 NCLEX 題型,以你的語言呈現。追蹤學習進度,讀得更聰明。

免費開始

僅供學習參考。實際臨床請遵循最新指引與所屬機構規範。