# Situation: The nurse coordinator of a hospital's bone health clinic plans an 8-session education program for 40 postmenopausal women with low bone mass. Most of the women are older adults, and several care for grandchildren at home. The program aims to reduce falls and fractures. For the next cycle of the program, the hospital wants to know whether the program itself causes any change in the women's exercise habits. Which evaluation design would give the STRONGEST evidence?

> source: MyMerci (mymerci.kr)  
> url: https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=630550  
> language: ko  
> subject: Nursing Practice IV — Care of Clients with Problems in Nutrition and Gastrointestinal, Metabolism and Endocrine, Perception and Coordination

## 문제

Situation: The nurse coordinator of a hospital's bone health clinic plans an 8-session education program for 40 postmenopausal women with low bone mass. Most of the women are older adults, and several care for grandchildren at home. The program aims to reduce falls and fractures.

For the next cycle of the program, the hospital wants to know whether the program itself causes any change in the women's exercise habits. Which evaluation design would give the STRONGEST evidence?

## 보기

1. Compare participants with a matched group from a clinic without the program
2. Compare women randomly assigned to the program or to usual care **✔ 정답**
3. Measure the women's habits several times before and after the program
4. Compare participants with women who chose not to join the program

**정답: 2**

## 해설

A randomized controlled design gives the strongest evidence that a program caused an effect, because random assignment balances known and unknown factors between groups. Matched or self-selected comparison groups and designs without a control group are weaker.

## 심화 해설

Randomization gives the strongest evidence of cause
The hospital wants to know whether the program itself causes a change in exercise habits. To show cause and effect, the evaluation must rule out other explanations for any change. Random assignment to the program or to usual care makes the two groups alike in both known and unknown factors, so a difference afterward can be attributed to the program. This is a randomized controlled design, the strongest design for testing whether an intervention works.

Why other designs are weaker
Every other design leaves room for the groups to differ in ways besides the program. A matched comparison group from another clinic is balanced on the matched factors, such as age, but may still differ in motivation, access to exercise space, or clinic culture. Repeated measures before and after the program without a control group show change over time but cannot separate the program's effect from other influences such as season, news reports, or natural improvement. Self-selected comparison groups, women who chose not to join, are the weakest: women who choose to attend are likely already more motivated, so they would exercise more even without the program.

| Design | Control group | Random assignment | Strength of causal evidence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Randomized to program or usual care | Yes | Yes | Strongest |
| Matched group from another clinic | Yes | No | Moderate |
| Repeated measures, before and after | No | No | Weaker |
| Participants versus women who declined | Yes | No (self-selected) | Weakest |

Key terms behind the answer
Confounding occurs when a third factor, such as motivation, affects both who receives the program and the outcome. Selection bias occurs when the way people enter groups makes the groups different from the start. Randomization is the main tool to prevent both. In a hospital program, usual care for the control group can include standard clinic advice, and the program can be offered to them later, which addresses ethical concerns about withholding a benefit.

Application
For the next cycle, the hospital could randomly assign eligible postmenopausal women with low bone mass either to the eight-session program or to usual care, measure exercise habits in both groups at the same time points, and compare the results. A difference between the groups can then be credited to the program with confidence.

Exam takeaway
Key point Does the program cause the change? Choose random assignment with a control group. Matching, before-and-after measures, and self-selected groups give weaker evidence.

## 임상 시나리오

Choosing an Evaluation DesignShowing that a program causes change
A randomized controlled design assigns women by chance to the program or to usual care, balancing known and unknown factors between groups.

Matched groups may still differ in unmatched factors, before-and-after designs lack a control group, and self-selected groups differ in motivation.

Randomization guards against confounding and selection bias, so a difference can be attributed to the program.

CautionWomen who choose to join a program usually differ from those who decline. Comparing them does not show that the program caused a change.

## 핵심 개념

- **Randomized controlled design** — A study design in which participants are assigned by chance to an intervention or a control group.
- **Confounding** — Distortion of a result by a third factor linked to both the exposure and the outcome.
- **Selection bias** — Error that arises when groups differ from the start because of how participants were chosen.
- **Control group** — A comparison group that does not receive the intervention being tested.

## 같은 주제 문제

- [Situation: A 52-year-old delivery driver was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus 1 wee…](https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=630346)
- [Situation: A 52-year-old delivery driver was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus 1 wee…](https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=630347)
- [Situation: A 52-year-old delivery driver was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus 1 wee…](https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=630348)
- [Situation: A 52-year-old delivery driver was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus 1 wee…](https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=630349)
- [Situation: A 52-year-old delivery driver was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus 1 wee…](https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=630350)
- [Situation: A 69-year-old woman with newly diagnosed hypothyroidism will go home on a daily…](https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=630446)
- [Situation: A 69-year-old woman with newly diagnosed hypothyroidism will go home on a daily…](https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=630447)
- [Situation: A 69-year-old woman with newly diagnosed hypothyroidism will go home on a daily…](https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=630448)

---

More free questions: [기출문제](https://mymerci.kr/)

_학습 참고용입니다. 실제 임상은 최신 지침과 소속 기관 프로토콜을 따르세요._