# Situation: A 38-year-old woman with bipolar I disorder is admitted to the psychiatric ward of a provincial hospital. The ward follows the Mental Health Act (Republic Act [RA] 11036). On the second day she becomes violent, and the attending psychiatrist orders physical restraint and emergency injections without her consent. Her decision-making capacity is then found impaired, and treatment without her consent continues for several weeks. Under RA 11036, how must the facility's internal review board review this treatment?

> source: MyMerci (mymerci.kr)  
> url: https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=629967  
> language: ko  
> subject: Nursing Practice V — Care of Clients with Maladaptive Patterns of Behavior; Care of Clients with Life-Threatening Conditions, Acute Multi-Organ Problems, High Acuity and Emergency Situations

## 문제

Situation: A 38-year-old woman with bipolar I disorder is admitted to the psychiatric ward of a provincial hospital. The ward follows the Mental Health Act (Republic Act [RA] 11036).

On the second day she becomes violent, and the attending psychiatrist orders physical restraint and emergency injections without her consent. Her decision-making capacity is then found impaired, and treatment without her consent continues for several weeks. Under RA 11036, how must the facility's internal review board review this treatment?

## 보기

1. Within 15 days, then every 15 days while it continues **✔ 정답**
2. Within 72 hours, then every 15 days while it continues
3. Within 15 days, then again only if she objects to it
4. Within 15 days, then every 30 days while it continues

**정답: 1**

## 해설

RA 11036 allows treatment or restraint without consent only during a psychiatric or neurologic emergency or while decision-making capacity is impaired, on the order of the attending mental health professional. Such treatment must be reviewed by the facility's internal review board within 15 days and every 15 days thereafter, so review is repeated for as long as treatment without consent continues.

## 심화 해설

Legal framework under RA 11036

The Philippine Mental Health Act permits treatment, physical restraint, or emergency medication without a patient’s consent only in two specific situations: during a psychiatric or neurologic emergency, or while the person’s decision-making capacity is impaired. The order must come from the attending mental health professional. Once such treatment begins, the law imposes a mandatory oversight mechanism through the facility’s internal review board.

The first review must occur within 15 days from the start of treatment without consent, and subsequent reviews must be repeated every 15 days for as long as the treatment continues. This means the review is not a one-time event. Even if the patient does not object, the board must keep reviewing the case at regular 15-day intervals. The correct answer is therefore option 1.

Watch out! The 72-hour option is a distractor. In some jurisdictions, emergency detention or initial observation periods use a 72-hour timeframe, but RA 11036 specifically requires the internal review board to act within 15 days, not 72 hours. Do not confuse the emergency response window with the review board timeline.

Key point! The review continues every 15 days regardless of whether the patient objects. Capacity impairment alone justifies continued treatment without consent, but it also triggers ongoing oversight. The board does not stop reviewing simply because the patient remains quiet or cooperative.

Why repeated review matters

Decision-making capacity can fluctuate, especially in bipolar I disorder. A patient who is acutely manic and violent on day 2 may regain capacity days or weeks later. The 15-day review cycle ensures that treatment without consent is not extended indefinitely without fresh justification. Each review must confirm that the original condition—emergency or impaired capacity—still exists and that the treatment remains the least restrictive appropriate option.

The scenario describes a woman who becomes violent on the second day of admission, receives emergency injections and physical restraint, and is then found to have impaired capacity. Her treatment without consent continues for several weeks. Under RA 11036, the internal review board must examine this treatment within the first 15 days and then again every 15 days thereafter. The correct answer is 1.

Clinical and legal reasoning for the PNLE/NCLEX-RN

For nursing licensure examinees, this question tests whether you can distinguish between the legal trigger for emergency intervention and the legal requirement for ongoing oversight. The emergency itself justifies immediate action, but the law adds a separate safeguard: institutional review. A nurse caring for this patient should document the restraint and injection, monitor for adverse effects, and be aware that the treatment plan must be reviewed by the internal review board at least every 15 days.

The review board typically examines whether the patient still lacks capacity, whether the treatment remains necessary, and whether less restrictive alternatives have been considered. This protects patient rights while allowing necessary care during acute psychiatric instability.

Comparison of review timelines

| Option | First review | Subsequent reviews | Correct under RA 11036? |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Within 15 days | Every 15 days while treatment continues | Yes |
| 2 | Within 72 hours | Every 15 days | No — first review is 15 days, not 72 hours |
| 3 | Within 15 days | Only if patient objects | No — review is mandatory regardless of objection |
| 4 | Within 15 days | Every 30 days | No — interval is 15 days, not 30 days |

Connection to involuntary hospitalization research

The provided abstract on involuntary psychiatric hospitalization in Belgium highlights that legal criteria govern when involuntary care is authorized, and that the number of involuntary admissions has been rising. Although the Belgian legal context differs from Philippine law, the underlying principle is the same: involuntary treatment requires both a clinical justification and a legal safeguard to prevent misuse. The study’s focus on comorbid personality disorders in involuntarily hospitalized patients reminds us that patients with impaired capacity may have complex presentations, which makes regular, structured review even more important.

In the Philippine setting, RA 11036 operationalizes this safeguard through the internal review board’s 15-day cycle. The nurse’s role includes ensuring that documentation supports the ongoing need for treatment without consent and that the review board’s decisions are incorporated into the care plan.

## 임상 시나리오

RA 11036 Review Board TimelineMandatory oversight for treatment without consent
Under the Philippine Mental Health Act, treatment without consent is allowed only during a psychiatric or neurologic emergency or while decision-making capacity is impaired, on the order of the attending mental health professional.

The facility's internal review board must conduct its first review within 15 days of starting treatment without consent, then repeat the review every 15 days for as long as the treatment continues.

CautionDo not confuse the 72-hour emergency observation window used in some jurisdictions with RA 11036's review board timeline. Review is not contingent on patient objection; it continues even if the patient is cooperative.

## 핵심 개념

- **RA 11036** — Philippine Mental Health Act governing mental health services, including treatment without consent and oversight mechanisms.
- **Internal review board** — Facility-based body mandated by RA 11036 to review treatment without consent at specified intervals.
- **Decision-making capacity** — A person's ability to understand, appreciate, and reason about treatment decisions; impairment allows treatment without consent under RA 11036.
- **Psychiatric emergency** — A situation where immediate intervention is needed to prevent harm; one of two conditions permitting treatment without consent.
- **Physical restraint** — Manual or mechanical restriction of movement; permitted without consent only during emergencies or impaired capacity under RA 11036.

## 같은 주제 문제

- [Situation: A 38-year-old woman with bipolar I disorder is admitted to the psychiatric ward…](https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=629966)
- [Situation: A 38-year-old woman with bipolar I disorder is admitted to the psychiatric ward…](https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=629968)
- [Situation: A 38-year-old woman with bipolar I disorder is admitted to the psychiatric ward…](https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=629969)
- [Situation: The nurse in a community mental health program leads a psychoeducation session …](https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=629970)
- [Situation: The nurse in a community mental health program leads a psychoeducation session …](https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=629971)
- [Situation: The nurse in a community mental health program leads a psychoeducation session …](https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=629972)
- [Situation: A 29-year-old factory worker is admitted to the psychiatric unit of a general h…](https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=629973)
- [Situation: A 29-year-old factory worker is admitted to the psychiatric unit of a general h…](https://mymerci.kr/pages/nclex_q.php?qn_id=629974)

---

More free questions: [기출문제](https://mymerci.kr/)

_학습 참고용입니다. 실제 임상은 최신 지침과 소속 기관 프로토콜을 따르세요._