Situation: A 67-year-old man is on the medical ward on day 4… | 마이메르시 MyMerci
이 문제가 수록된 문제집PLNE Question Bank 1500 문제집 보기
Nursing Practice IV — Care of Clients with Problems in Nutrition and Gastrointestinal, Metabolism and Endocrine, Perception and Coordination
문제

Situation: A 67-year-old man is on the medical ward on day 4 after an ischemic stroke with right-sided weakness. The ward uses a problem-oriented record with nursing progress notes in SOAPIE format (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan, Intervention, Evaluation), kept in an electronic health record. During the week, four medication and specimen events involving him are reported. Which event is a near miss?

해설
A near miss is an incident that did not reach the client. Whether harm occurred does not decide it: an error that reaches the client without harm is a no-harm incident. Only the mislabeled tube, caught before it left the ward, never reached him; all four events are still reported.
같은 주제 다음 문제Situation: A 64-year-old woman with liver cirrhosis is admitted to the medical ward becaus…이 문제가 수록된 문제집PLNE Question Bank 150014,000원 · 무료 체험 가능

심화 해설

Near miss means it did not reach the client
A near miss is an incident that did not reach the client: an error or hazard was caught before it affected him. Whether harm occurred does not decide whether an event is a near miss; an error that reaches the client without causing harm is a no-harm incident. Of the four events, only the blood tube labeled with another client's name was caught before it was sent. The mislabeled specimen never produced a result in his record or led to treatment, so the error never reached him. That is a near miss.

Classifying the other events
In the other three events, the error reached the client. Another client's infusion ran into him for one minute before it was stopped. He received an aspirin dose meant for his roommate. His 09:00 aspirin was missed and given late at 11:00; an omitted or delayed dose is an error that reached him. None caused harm, so each is a no-harm incident, not a near miss. If any had caused harm, it would be classified as an adverse event or harmful incident.

EventReached him?Classification
Mislabeled tube caught before sendingNoNear miss
Wrong infusion for 1 minuteYesNo-harm incident
Roommate's aspirin givenYesNo-harm incident
Aspirin given 2 hours lateYesNo-harm incident

Why all four are still reported
Incident reporting is not only for events that cause harm. Near misses and no-harm incidents are reported too, because they reveal weaknesses in the system, such as patient identification and labeling practices, before an error causes harm. In this week, several events involve patient identification, which suggests a pattern the risk management team should study. Reports are factual and nonpunitive, focusing on what happened and how to prevent it.

Prevention
Using two client identifiers when giving medications and collecting specimens, labeling tubes at the bedside in the client's presence, and scanning wristbands where available all reduce these errors.

Exam takeaway
Watch out "No ill effect" does not make an event a near miss. Ask whether the error reached the client: if it did not, it is a near miss; if it did without harm, it is a no-harm incident.

임상 시나리오

Near Miss or No-Harm IncidentDid the error reach the client?

A near miss is an incident caught before it reached the client, such as a mislabeled tube stopped before it was sent.

An error that reached the client without harm, such as a wrong infusion, wrong-client dose, or late dose, is a no-harm incident.

All of these events are reported, because they reveal system weaknesses such as patient identification.

Caution

Absence of harm does not decide the category. The deciding question is whether the error reached the client.

핵심 개념

PNLE Question Bank 1500 1,500 문제 · 로그인 없이 바로 볼 수 있어요

마이메르시로 국가고시 완벽 대비

기출문제와 상세 해설을 무료로. 내 약점을 분석하고 진도를 관리하며 더 똑똑하게 공부하세요.

무료로 시작하기

학습 참고용입니다. 실제 임상은 최신 지침과 소속 기관 프로토콜을 따르세요.