In a client who reports auditory hallucinations, the first nursing priority is always safety. The nurse must determine whether the voices are issuing commands, because command hallucinations carry a direct risk of harm to self or others. Asking “Are the voices telling you to do anything?” is therefore the correct first question.
Auditory hallucinations are a core feature of schizophrenia spectrum disorders and are frequently associated with severe distress
[1]. Among these,
command hallucinations represent a subtype in which the voice directs the person to perform a specific act. They are strongly associated with harmful behaviors toward the self and others, which is why they are treated as a clinical emergency
[3]. The immediate nursing responsibility is not to explore the onset, number, or reality of the voices, but to assess the content for dangerous commands.
A voice that commands the client to hurt someone or to harm himself changes the entire plan of care and may require emergency intervention. The Harm Command Safety Protocol was developed specifically to guide clinicians in responding to command hallucinations to harm, underscoring that this assessment must occur before any other exploration of the hallucination
[2]. Even when a client does not appear agitated, the presence of a command hallucination is a risk factor that must be ruled out first.
The other options are not wrong questions, but they are not the first question. Asking whether the client knows the voices are not real assesses insight, which is often impaired in schizophrenia and does not immediately address safety. Asking when the voices began or how many voices are present gathers descriptive information that can be collected later, after danger has been excluded.
Key point! In a client with auditory hallucinations, the first assessment is always about command content and potential for harm.
Watch out! Do not delay the safety assessment by asking about insight, duration, or number of voices first.
Command hallucinations are considered among the most distressing symptoms of schizophrenia, and they are associated with higher levels of voice-related distress and stronger beliefs about the voice’s power
[4]. This distress can increase the likelihood that the person will act on the command, making early identification essential. The nurse should ask directly and without hesitation whether the voices are telling the client to do anything, and if so, what specifically they are commanding.
| Priority | Question | Rationale |
|---|
| 1 | Are the voices telling you to do anything? | Identifies command hallucinations and risk of harm to self or others |
| 2 | When did you first begin hearing voices? | Gathers history after safety is established |
| 3 | How many different voices can you hear? | Descriptive detail, not an immediate safety concern |
| 4 | Do you know that the voices are not real? | Assesses insight, which is not the first priority |
The relationship between hearing a command and acting on it is mediated by multiple variables, including the perceived power of the voice and the person’s beliefs about responsibility
[2][4]. Because compliance with command hallucinations is associated with harmful behaviors, the nurse cannot assume that a calm presentation means the client is safe
[3]. Direct questioning about command content is the fastest way to identify an emergency and initiate protective measures.
References (research sources)
- [1]
Psychological Interventions Targeting Auditory Hallucinations in Persons With Psychotic Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Meta-analysis/systematic reviewFässler L, Koop S, Opper F, Bighelli I, Leucht S, Sabé M, Bajbouj M, Knaevelsrud C, Böge K. (2026) · DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2026.1443
- [2]
Responding to command hallucinations to harm: the unpleasant voices scale and harm command safety protocol.Research articleGerlock AA, Buccheri R, Buffum MD, Trygstad L, Dowling GA (2010) · DOI: 10.3928/02793695-20100304-03
- [3]
Clinical Correlates of Compliance, Appeasement and Resistance in Command Hallucinations: A Systematic Review.Meta-analysis/systematic reviewMedas M, Georgiades A. (2026) · DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70246
- [4]
Distress, omnipotence, and responsibility beliefs in command hallucinations.Research articleEllett L, Luzon O, Birchwood M, Abbas Z, Harris A, Chadwick P (2017) · DOI: 10.1111/bjc.12139