Situation: A 70-year-old man with type 2 diabetes, chronic k… | 마이메르시 MyMerci
이 문제가 수록된 문제집PLNE Question Bank 1500 문제집 보기
Nursing Practice III — Care of Clients with Problems in Surgery, Oxygenation, Fluid and Electrolytes, Infectious, Inflammatory and Immunologic Response, Cellular Aberrations
문제

Situation: A 70-year-old man with type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate 28 mL/min/1.73 m²), and atrial fibrillation is admitted to the adult medical ward with an infected foot ulcer. On admission, his international normalized ratio (INR) is 2.6 and his capillary blood glucose is 286 mg/dL (15.9 mmol/L). The nurse performs medication reconciliation. Home medicines: warfarin 5 mg daily; metformin 500 mg twice daily; amlodipine 5 mg daily; atorvastatin 20 mg at bedtime Admission orders: warfarin 5 mg daily; enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously daily; insulin by sliding scale; amlodipine 5 mg daily; intravenous clindamycin Which discrepancy should the nurse clarify with the prescriber FIRST?

해설
Medication reconciliation compares home medicines with current orders, and the discrepancy with the greatest risk of harm is clarified first. With an INR of 2.6 on warfarin, an added enoxaparin dose duplicates anticoagulation (both high-alert drugs) and raises bleeding risk, and the prophylactic 40 mg dose may also need reduction if his creatinine clearance is below 30 mL/min. Omitting metformin is expected because it is contraindicated with an estimated glomerular filtration rate below 30, and a missing statin carries no immediate risk.
같은 주제 다음 문제Situation: The adult medical ward of a tertiary hospital reviews its medication safety eve…이 문제가 수록된 문제집PLNE Question Bank 150014,000원 · 무료 체험 가능

심화 해설

Clarify the most dangerous discrepancy first
Medication reconciliation compares the medicines a client takes at home with the current orders, identifies every omission, duplication, and dose change, and resolves each with the prescriber. When several discrepancies exist, the one with the greatest risk of harm is clarified first. This client's INR is 2.6 on warfarin, which is already in the therapeutic range, and the admission orders continue warfarin while adding enoxaparin 40 mg daily. Two anticoagulants, both high-alert drugs, in a client who is already anticoagulated is a therapeutic duplication with a high bleeding risk, so this is clarified first.

Why the duplication is so risky
Enoxaparin is often added on admission for venous thrombosis prophylaxis, but a client with a therapeutic INR already has anticoagulant protection. Adding a low-molecular-weight heparin increases the risk of serious bleeding without a clear benefit. His kidney function adds to the danger: enoxaparin is cleared by the kidneys, and with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 28 mL/min/1.73 m² the drug can accumulate, so even the prophylactic dose may need reduction when creatinine clearance is below 30 mL/min. An infected foot ulcer that may need debridement makes bleeding even more relevant.

DiscrepancyRiskPriority
Enoxaparin added while warfarin continues (INR 2.6)Major bleeding from duplicate anticoagulationFirst
Metformin omittedLikely intentional: contraindicated with eGFR below 30Confirm
Atorvastatin omittedNo immediate danger from a short omissionClarify later
Amlodipine continued at home doseNo discrepancyNone

Why the other discrepancies rank lower
Metformin is contraindicated when the estimated glomerular filtration rate is below 30 because of the risk of lactic acidosis, and acutely ill clients with high glucose are usually managed with insulin, so its omission is probably intentional. It still needs to be confirmed and documented, but leaving it out is not dangerous. A missing statin should be clarified, but a short omission carries no immediate harm. Amlodipine is continued at the same dose, so there is no discrepancy at all.

Watch out! A discrepancy is not the same as an error. Some differences between home and admission medicines are deliberate. The nurse confirms each one, documents the reason, and acts first on the one that could cause harm soonest.

Exam takeaway
Key point! In reconciliation questions, rank by harm: duplicated high-alert drugs, especially anticoagulants, insulin, and opioids, come first. Also consider kidney function, which changes the safety of drugs such as enoxaparin and metformin. Then clarify omissions that carry less immediate risk.

임상 시나리오

Medication Reconciliation PrioritiesDuplicate anticoagulation on admission

Medication reconciliation compares home medicines with current orders. The discrepancy with the greatest risk of harm is clarified first.

Enoxaparin added to warfarin with an INR of 2.6 is a therapeutic duplication of high-alert drugs and raises the bleeding risk. With an eGFR of 28, enoxaparin can also accumulate.

Metformin omission is likely intentional because it is contraindicated with an eGFR below 30; confirm it. A missing statin carries no immediate risk.

Caution

A therapeutic INR already provides anticoagulation; do not give added enoxaparin until the prescriber has reviewed the duplication.

핵심 개념

PNLE Question Bank 1500 1,500 문제 · 로그인 없이 바로 볼 수 있어요

마이메르시로 국가고시 완벽 대비

기출문제와 상세 해설을 무료로. 내 약점을 분석하고 진도를 관리하며 더 똑똑하게 공부하세요.

무료로 시작하기

학습 참고용입니다. 실제 임상은 최신 지침과 소속 기관 프로토콜을 따르세요.