Three Delays Model Applied to the Timeline
The Three Delays Model divides the interval between the onset of an obstetric emergency and definitive treatment into three phases:
Delay 1 — deciding to seek care,
Delay 2 — reaching a facility, and
Delay 3 — receiving adequate care. In this case, the timeline shows that the danger was recognized almost immediately, yet the family waited for the husband before taking any action. That waiting period is the defining feature of Delay 1.
| Delay phase | What it measures | This case | Contribution to death |
|---|
| Delay 1: Deciding to seek care | Time from recognition of a problem to the decision to act | Danger recognized at 2105H, but family waited until 2305H for the husband | 2 hours lost — the largest and most lethal interval |
| Delay 2: Reaching the facility | Travel time after the decision is made | Left at 2305H, arrived at 2335H | 30 minutes — relatively short, not the primary problem |
| Delay 3: Receiving adequate care | Time from arrival to initiation of appropriate treatment | Assessed at 2335H; IV fluids, uterotonics, and blood started at 2345H | 10 minutes — prompt, no meaningful delay |
The family’s decision to wait for the husband before seeking care consumed two full hours, while travel and treatment initiation together accounted for only 40 minutes. Postpartum hemorrhage is a time-critical emergency because blood loss continues relentlessly; every hour of untreated bleeding worsens hypovolemia, coagulopathy, and end-organ hypoperfusion. The Myanmar maternal death surveillance study frames Delay 1 precisely as the interval from the start of the woman’s illness to the time the problem is recognized as requiring care, and it identifies this phase as a major contributor to maternal deaths
[1]. In this scenario, recognition was not the problem — the delay occurred after recognition, when the family consciously postponed action.
Watch out! Do not confuse “recognizing danger signs” with “deciding to seek care.” The relative recognized the danger within
5 minutes, so option 3 is incorrect. The delay was not in awareness but in the decision to act on that awareness.
Key point! In the Three Delays Model, Delay 1 is often the deadliest because it occurs before the woman ever reaches the health system. The Pakistan analysis similarly emphasizes that contextual and household-level factors — such as waiting for a husband or other decision-maker — commonly prolong Delay 1 and drive maternal mortality . Community education and birth preparedness that designate a decision-maker in advance are the interventions that target this delay.
The Somalia commentary reinforces that Delay 1 is rooted in community and household dynamics, not facility capacity . Even when a CEmONC facility is available and staff respond rapidly, as in this case, a prolonged pre-decision interval can render all downstream care futile. The Cameroon study focuses on Delays 2 and 3, but its framing underscores that each delay must be analyzed separately; a short Delay 2 or 3 does not erase a catastrophic Delay 1 .
Because the woman arrived at a fully equipped CEmONC facility and received uterotonics and blood within 10 minutes, the only interval long enough to explain her death was the 2-hour wait at home before the decision to leave. The correct answer is therefore
Delay 1: deciding to seek care.
References (research sources)
- [1]
Causes of death, three delays, and factors associated with Delay 1 among maternal deaths in Myanmar: The maternal death surveillance in 2019.Research articleTun KK, Inthaphatha S, Soe MM, Nishino K, Hamajima N, Yamamoto E (2023) · DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103657