Conceptual focus
The question asks you to differentiate Pender’s Health Promotion Model (HPM) from three other widely tested behavior-change frameworks. The correct answer is
2 because HPM explains wellness-oriented behavior through positive motivators rather than through fear of illness.
Pender’s model is built on the idea that people move toward health because they value well-being, not because they are running away from disease. This makes it especially appropriate for healthy adults who have no existing threat to avoid. The model organizes influences on health-promoting behavior into individual characteristics and experiences, behavior-specific cognitions and affect, and behavioral outcomes. Key modifiable factors include
perceived benefits,
perceived barriers,
self-efficacy,
activity-related affect, and
interpersonal and situational influences [1][2].
Watch out! The Health Belief Model (HBM) does rely on threat appraisal. Its core predictors are
perceived susceptibility and
perceived severity, combined with perceived benefits and barriers. Option 3 describes HBM, not Pender’s model. For a program targeting healthy adults, threat-based messaging is less relevant because these individuals may not perceive themselves as susceptible to any disease.
| Model | Core focus | Key constructs | Best fit for this program |
|---|
| Pender’s Health Promotion Model | Approach-oriented wellness behavior | Perceived benefits, barriers, self-efficacy, affect, interpersonal and situational influences | Healthy adults seeking greater well-being |
| Health Belief Model | Avoidance-oriented threat appraisal | Perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, barriers, cues to action | Populations with a specific disease threat |
| Transtheoretical Model | Readiness to change over time | Stages of change, processes of change, decisional balance | Programs matched to a person’s stage |
| Theory of Planned Behavior | Intention as the immediate antecedent of behavior | Attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control | Behaviors strongly influenced by social pressure |
Key point! Option 1 describes the
Transtheoretical Model, which sorts people into precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance stages. Option 4 describes the
Theory of Planned Behavior, which explains behavior through attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. Neither is the reason the nurses selected Pender’s model.
The evidence supports HPM’s practical value in nursing and primary care. An integrative review found that HPM has been applied to dietary behaviors in people with hypertension, healthy aging, and breastfeeding support, demonstrating its flexibility across wellness-focused contexts . A quasi-experimental study using the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II showed that a Pender-based nursing intervention improved healthy behaviors and quality of life in adults over
20 years of age . These applications share a common thread: they target people who are not primarily motivated by fear of a current disease but by the desire to enhance their health.
For a physical activity program in healthy adults, HPM directs the nurse to strengthen self-efficacy, highlight the positive feelings associated with activity, reduce perceived barriers, and mobilize social support. This approach aligns with the provincial health office’s goal of promoting wellness across municipalities rather than preventing a single disease.
References (research sources)
- [1]
Theory analysis for Pender's health promotion model (HPM) by Barnum's criteria: a critical perspective.Research articleKhoshnood Z, Rayyani M, Tirgari B (2018) · DOI: 10.1515/ijamh-2017-0160
- [2]
Application and Effectiveness of the Nola Pender Model in Nursing: A Narrative Review.Research articleTorres ILR, Rojas DMP, Amell GL, Martínez SG. (2026) · DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_442_24