A nurse is conducting a pain assessment for a 30-year-old pa… | 마이메르시 MyMerci
마이메르시 — 문제와 상세 해설까지 전부 무료 무료로 시작하기
Fundamentals
문제

A nurse is conducting a pain assessment for a 30-year-old patient who was admitted with chronic lower back pain. Which assessment approach would provide the most comprehensive evaluation of the patient's pain experience?

해설
A systematic approach assessing location, quality, intensity, timing, aggravating and relieving factors provides the most comprehensive pain evaluation. Other options are limited: pain scale alone lacks detail, observation is subjective, and history review is incomplete without current assessment.
같은 주제 다음 문제A nurse is assessing pain in a 65-year-old patient who underwent abdominal surgery 24 hour…

심화 해설


Pain is a subjective, multidimensional experience. To capture its full impact on a patient, a comprehensive assessment must go beyond a single number or isolated observation. The most effective approach systematically evaluates the sensory, affective, and temporal dimensions of pain, which directly informs diagnosis and treatment planning.



Using a systematic framework such as PQRST (Provocative/Palliative, Quality, Region/Radiation, Severity, Timing) or OLDCART (Onset, Location, Duration, Characteristics, Aggravating factors, Relieving factors, Treatment) ensures that no critical component of the pain experience is missed. This method aligns with the nursing process by gathering data on location, quality (e.g., aching, burning, shooting), intensity using a validated scale, timing (onset, duration, pattern), and aggravating and relieving factors. For a patient with chronic lower back pain, understanding that the pain is a dull ache (quality) that worsens with prolonged sitting (aggravating factor) and improves with a specific stretching routine (relieving factor) provides far richer clinical data than a pain score of 6/10 alone. This holistic data set is essential for identifying the underlying pain mechanism (nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic) and tailoring effective non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions. The need for such structured, comprehensive nursing activities in chronic pain management is a key strategy for effective primary care integration [1].



The other options represent components of a pain assessment but are insufficient in isolation. Asking for a pain intensity score (Option 1) provides a useful quantitative measure but ignores the qualitative and contextual factors that explain the score. Observing non-verbal cues (Option 2) is a valuable part of the physical assessment, but behaviors can be incongruent with self-reported pain and do not provide specific details about the pain’s characteristics. Reviewing the medical history and medication records (Option 3) offers important background but addresses past treatments rather than the patient’s current, dynamic pain experience. Only a systematic, multi-domain interview integrates all these elements to form a complete clinical picture.


References (research sources)
  • [1]
    Strategies for Implementing Nursing Activities for Chronic Pain Management in Primary Care: Integrated Findings from a Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.Research articleBernier A, Poitras ME, Poirier MD, Beaudoin S, Lacasse A. (2026) · DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2026.2659029

임상 시나리오

📋 Clinical Practice Guide: Comprehensive Pain Assessment

A structured, multidimensional assessment is the cornerstone of effective pain management. For a patient with chronic lower back pain, using a systematic framework ensures all aspects of the pain experience are captured, guiding accurate diagnosis and individualized treatment.

📌 Recommended Assessment Frameworks
  • PQRST Method: Provocative/Palliative factors, Quality, Region/Radiation, Severity, Timing.
  • OLDCART Method: Onset, Location, Duration, Characteristics, Aggravating factors, Relieving factors, Treatment.
📌 Key Components to Evaluate
  • Location & Radiation: Ask the patient to point to the pain site and describe if it travels.
  • Quality: Use descriptors like aching, burning, shooting, or stabbing to differentiate nociceptive from neuropathic pain.
  • Intensity: Utilize a validated scale (0-10 NRS, VAS, or Faces scale) at rest and during activity.
  • Temporal Pattern: Document onset, duration, frequency, and whether pain is constant or intermittent.
  • Aggravating & Relieving Factors: Identify specific movements, positions, or interventions that worsen or ease the pain.
  • Functional Impact: Assess how pain affects sleep, mood, mobility, and activities of daily living.
📌 Clinical Application Example

Instead of recording only "pain 6/10," document: "Patient reports a constant dull ache (quality) in the lumbar region without radiation (location). Pain increases to 8/10 with prolonged sitting (aggravating factor) and decreases to 3/10 after performing prescribed stretching exercises (relieving factor). Onset was gradual over 6 months (timing)." This data suggests a mechanical/nociceptive component and supports targeted physical therapy and ergonomic modifications.

핵심 개념

Merci NCLEX-RN Question Bank 3,445 문제 · 로그인 없이 바로 볼 수 있어요

마이메르시로 국가고시 완벽 대비

기출문제와 상세 해설을 무료로. 내 약점을 분석하고 진도를 관리하며 더 똑똑하게 공부하세요.

무료로 시작하기

학습 참고용입니다. 실제 임상은 최신 지침과 소속 기관 프로토콜을 따르세요.