A 52-year-old patient in the cardiac catheterization lab sud… | 마이메르시 MyMerci
마이메르시 — 문제와 상세 해설까지 전부 무료 무료로 시작하기
Critical Care
문제

A 52-year-old patient in the cardiac catheterization lab suddenly develops ventricular fibrillation (VF) on the cardiac monitor. The nurse immediately begins CPR. After 2 minutes of high-quality CPR, the first defibrillation shock is delivered at 200 joules biphasic. The rhythm remains VF. What is the nurse's next priority action according to ACLS guidelines?

해설
After unsuccessful defibrillation in VF, ACLS guidelines prioritize resuming CPR for 2 minutes before reassessing. Other options are incorrect as they delay CPR or use inappropriate interventions.
같은 주제 다음 문제A 68-year-old patient in the ICU is experiencing ventricular fibrillation. The nurse is pr…

심화 해설


Understanding the ACLS Algorithm for Shock-Refractory VF

The core of this scenario lies in the Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) Cardiac Arrest Algorithm for ventricular fibrillation (VF) and pulseless ventricular tachycardia. When a rhythm is "shock-refractory," meaning it persists after a defibrillation attempt, the immediate priority is not another shock or medication, but a return to high-quality chest compressions.


The 2020 American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines, which form the basis of ACLS protocols, emphasize minimizing interruptions in chest compressions. After a shock is delivered, the myocardium is in a stunned state and does not immediately generate a perfusing rhythm, even if the shock successfully terminated the VF. A pulse check immediately post-shock is unreliable and delays the restoration of coronary and cerebral perfusion pressure. The evidence shows that deviations from these structured ACLS guidelines are common and are associated with worse patient outcomes [1]. Therefore, the algorithm dictates an immediate resumption of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for a full 2-minute cycle, starting with chest compressions, before any further rhythm analysis, pulse check, or drug administration.



Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

  • Option 1 (Increase energy and shock immediately): While escalating the defibrillation energy is a consideration for subsequent shocks, delivering a shock immediately after the first one without an intervening period of CPR is not recommended. A stacked-shock sequence has not been shown to improve survival and prolongs the no-flow time, depriving the heart and brain of oxygen.

  • Option 3 (Administer epinephrine, then shock): Epinephrine is a critical vasopressor in cardiac arrest, but its timing in the algorithm is specific. The first dose of epinephrine 1 mg IV/IO is given after the second shock. The sequence is: Shock → CPR 2 min → Rhythm check/Shock → CPR 2 min → Rhythm check/Shock + Epinephrine. Administering it before the second shock deviates from the structured, evidence-based sequence designed to optimize both drug delivery and perfusion.

  • Option 4 (Check pulse and prepare for synchronized cardioversion): A pulse check is not indicated at this point because the rhythm on the monitor is confirmed as VF, a non-perfusing rhythm. Furthermore, synchronized cardioversion is the treatment for unstable tachyarrhythmias with a pulse (like unstable atrial fibrillation). It is contraindicated in pulseless VF, where unsynchronized high-energy shocks (defibrillation) are required. Attempting to synchronize with a chaotic VF waveform is often impossible and causes a dangerous delay in therapy.




The priority action is to immediately resume high-quality CPR for 2 minutes to maintain myocardial and cerebral perfusion, which is the foundational intervention that makes subsequent defibrillation attempts and pharmacological therapies more effective. This structured approach, emphasizing continuous compressions with minimal interruptions, is a key component that less experienced code leaders must master to avoid common deviations from guidelines [1].

References (research sources)
  • [1]
    CPADS-30: Mastering the first 30 seconds of adult cardiac arrest resuscitation.Research articleFord JS, Malhotra A, Pearce AK, Wardi G. (2025) · DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.06.056

임상 시나리오

Clinical Practice Guide

Following the first unsuccessful defibrillation for ventricular fibrillation (VF), the immediate priority is to resume high-quality chest compressions. Do not delay CPR to check a pulse or rhythm, as the post-shock myocardium is stunned and requires perfusion to recover. The ACLS algorithm mandates a 2-minute cycle of CPR before the next rhythm analysis or intervention.

Key Algorithm Steps for Shock-Refractory VF
  • Post-Shock CPR: Immediately after any shock, resume chest compressions for 2 minutes without interruption. Start with compressions, not ventilation.
  • Rhythm Reassessment: After the 2-minute CPR cycle, briefly analyze the rhythm. If VF persists, prepare for the next shock.
  • Second Shock: Deliver the second shock at an equal or higher energy level (e.g., 200 joules biphasic, escalating to 300 or 360 joules as per device manufacturer).
  • Vasopressor Administration: Epinephrine 1 mg IV/IO is administered after the second shock, during the subsequent CPR cycle. Do not give it before or immediately after the first shock.
  • Antiarrhythmic Consideration: Amiodarone or lidocaine may be considered after the third shock for persistent VF.
Critical Safety Points
  • Never perform synchronized cardioversion for a pulseless rhythm; VF requires unsynchronized defibrillation.
  • Minimize peri-shock pauses. Compressions should be paused only for rhythm analysis and shock delivery, with a goal of a chest compression fraction >60%.
  • Rotate the compressor every 2 minutes to prevent fatigue and maintain high-quality compressions with adequate depth and rate.

핵심 개념

Merci NCLEX-RN Question Bank 3,445 문제 · 로그인 없이 바로 볼 수 있어요

마이메르시로 국가고시 완벽 대비

기출문제와 상세 해설을 무료로. 내 약점을 분석하고 진도를 관리하며 더 똑똑하게 공부하세요.

무료로 시작하기
App Store Google Play

학습 참고용입니다. 실제 임상은 최신 지침과 소속 기관 프로토콜을 따르세요.