A 3-year-old child is brought to the emergency department af… | 마이메르시 MyMerci
마이메르시 — 문제와 상세 해설까지 전부 무료 무료로 시작하기
Child Health
문제

A 3-year-old child is brought to the emergency department after ingesting an unknown amount of household bleach 30 minutes ago. The child is alert and crying, with no visible burns around the mouth. What is the nurse's priority action?

해설
The priority is to assess ABCs (airway, breathing, circulation) to ensure immediate physiological stability, as bleach ingestion can cause rapid airway compromise. Other options are contraindicated for caustic substances.
같은 주제 다음 문제A 3-year-old child is brought to the emergency department after ingesting an unknown house…

심화 해설

Priority Action for Pediatric Toxic Ingestion

When a child presents with a known or suspected toxic ingestion, the foundational principle of emergency care is to evaluate and stabilize physiological function before addressing the specific poison. The Pediatric Assessment Triangle (PAT) provides a structured, rapid visual and auditory assessment framework that begins the moment the child is observed. It evaluates three critical domains: Appearance, Work of Breathing, and Circulation to the Skin. This tool is designed to support the early identification of critically ill children and guide immediate triage and management decisions [1]. In this scenario, although the child is described as alert and crying—which suggests a patent airway and adequate cerebral perfusion at this moment—the ingestion of a caustic substance like household bleach carries a high risk for rapid airway compromise from edema and aspiration. Therefore, the nurse's priority is to formally assess the physiological components represented by the PAT: the airway, breathing, and circulation (ABCs).

The other options represent contraindicated or secondary interventions. Inducing vomiting is strictly prohibited after ingestion of a caustic substance because it causes re-exposure of the esophageal and oropharyngeal mucosa to the corrosive agent, dramatically increasing the risk of perforation and further burns. Administering activated charcoal is ineffective for caustic ingestions; it does not bind to bleach and the black liquid obscures visualization of mucosal burns during subsequent endoscopy. Giving milk or other diluents is not a priority action and is generally not recommended outside of a specific poison control directive, as it may induce vomiting and does not halt the progression of tissue injury. The immediate application of the PAT framework directs the nurse to systematically confirm the integrity of the child's ABCs before any decontamination or dilution strategy is considered [1].
References (research sources)
  • [1]
    Clinical accuracy and applications of the Pediatric Assessment Triangle in emergency care: a narrative review.Research articleRath S, Alsabri M, Alhaddad J, Patel A, Chacko MM, Bucciarelli B. (2026) · DOI: 10.1186/s12245-026-01169-2

임상 시나리오

Pediatric Caustic Ingestion: Initial AssessmentPrioritizing ABCs over Decontamination

The immediate priority for a child with a known or suspected caustic ingestion is assessing and stabilizing the airway, breathing, and circulation (ABCs). Even if the child is initially alert, rapid airway edema can develop, leading to obstruction.

The Pediatric Assessment Triangle (PAT) provides a rapid framework, evaluating Appearance, Work of Breathing, and Circulation to the Skin to identify physiological instability before a hands-on assessment.

Caution

Never induce vomiting after a caustic ingestion; it causes re-exposure of the mucosa to the corrosive agent, drastically increasing the risk of esophageal perforation. Activated charcoal is also contraindicated as it does not bind to caustics and can obscure endoscopic visualization.

핵심 개념

Merci NCLEX-RN Question Bank 3,445 문제 · 로그인 없이 바로 볼 수 있어요

마이메르시로 국가고시 완벽 대비

기출문제와 상세 해설을 무료로. 내 약점을 분석하고 진도를 관리하며 더 똑똑하게 공부하세요.

무료로 시작하기

학습 참고용입니다. 실제 임상은 최신 지침과 소속 기관 프로토콜을 따르세요.