Quick answerHypokalemia from insulin-driven potassium shift; hold insulin per protocol and infuse IV potassium as prescribed; monitor serum potassium every 1 to 2 hours and the continuous ECG rhythm.
Why this is correctGlucose, pH, and bicarbonate are all moving in the right direction, so the ketoacidosis is responding to therapy. Potassium, however, has dropped from 4.6 to 3.1 mEq/L and flattened T waves have appeared. Consensus guidance directs potassium replacement and holding insulin when potassium falls below 3.5 mEq/L, because further insulin would push potassium even lower and risk dysrhythmias and respiratory muscle weakness.
Easy analogy or mental pictureInsulin is a doorman that ushers potassium from the bloodstream into the cells. When the hallway is almost empty, close the door for a moment and refill the hallway before letting the doorman work again.
Memory hook"Under 3.5 — potassium in, insulin paused."
NCLEX decision ruleIn a DKA client on an insulin infusion, a potassium below 3.5 mEq/L outranks the glucose number: replace potassium and pause insulin, then monitor potassium and cardiac rhythm closely.
Why the other choices are wrongHypertonic saline treats cerebral edema, but this client's level of consciousness is unchanged and oriented, with no headache or pupil change. Bicarbonate is not indicated at pH 7.28, and increasing insulin would worsen hypokalemia even though the anion gap is still open. HHS is excluded by an effective osmolality of 285 mOsm/kg (2 x 132 + 380/18) with marked ketoacidosis, and persistent ketoacidosis is contradicted by the steadily improving pH and bicarbonate. Serum osmolality and urine specific gravity are less specific, and neurologic checks track the cerebral-edema differential rather than the potassium problem.
References
1ADA Consensus Report — Hyperglycemic Crises in Adults With Diabetes (2024)During DKA treatment, potassium below 3.5 mmol/L requires potassium replacement with insulin delayed or held until potassium is restored, plus frequent electrolyte checks.