Stage 6 — Evaluate outcomes. Review the isolation, diagnosti… | MyMerci
More questions like thisTry ›
Standard/Transmission-Based Precautions/Surgical Asepsis

Stage 6 — Evaluate outcomes. Review the isolation, diagnostic, treatment, and exposure-follow-up timeline and answer the three outcome questions.

Trend

Choose your responses, then check the answer.

TimeData
0700 — RecognitionThree-week cough with blood-streaked sputum, weight loss, night sweats, recent infectious TB contact, and a cavitary right-upper-lobe lesion are recognized after six hours in a non-AIIR room.
0710 to 0810 — ContainmentThe client is masked, the door is closed, entry is limited, qualified personnel use fit-tested N95 or higher protection, and AIIR transfer is completed without another unprotected entry.
1100 — Diagnostic and treatment responseFirst sputum is AFB-smear 3+ and NAAT-positive for M. tuberculosis complex. Culture and susceptibility testing are pending. The TB clinician starts an appropriate multidrug regimen after specimens are obtained.
48 hours — Isolation reviewThree specimens were collected 8 to 24 hours apart, including one early-morning specimen. Two smears are positive and the third is pending. Cough persists, and no alternative diagnosis explains the syndrome.
48 hours — Exposure follow-upThe chemotherapy recipient and 3-year-old child receive prompt medical evaluation. Healthcare personnel receive symptom screens; previously negative personnel are tested now and scheduled for repeat testing 8 to 10 weeks after last exposure if the first test is negative. Prior-positive personnel receive symptom evaluation rather than automatic retesting.

Q1. Which isolation evaluation is most accurate at 48 hours?

Q2. Which finding best shows that healthcare-personnel follow-up is correctly structured?

Q3. Which interpretation of the diagnostic and treatment response is most accurate?

Explanation
Outcome evaluation
Airborne precautions must continue because the client remains symptomatic, two smears are positive, the third is pending, and no alternative diagnosis explains the syndrome. The investigation is appropriately risk-based when the immunocompromised roommate and young child receive prompt evaluation and healthcare-personnel follow-up reflects prior test history. For personnel with a prior negative test, an immediate test plus repeat testing 8 to 10 weeks after the last exposure if initially negative closes the testing window. NAAT supports rapid diagnosis but does not replace culture and susceptibility results needed for definitive regimen decisions.
Next question on this topicA nurse is caring for a client newly admitted with suspected methicillin-resistant Staphyl…From this question bank[전통+신유형] NCLEX LEVEL UP 패키지KRW 79,000
Browse all questions No login required

Master the NCLEX-RN with MyMerci

Thousands of NCLEX-style questions with detailed rationale — in your language. Track your progress and study smarter.

Start for free

For study reference only. Always follow current clinical guidelines and your institution’s protocols.