Quick answerExplain each option and preserve the client's right to decline any procedure or withdraw consent.
Why this is correctSexual assault removes personal control, so the examination should return choices to the client rather than create another coercive experience. Consent applies separately and continuously to medical care, examination steps, photographs, and evidence collection.
Easy analogy or mental pictureConsent is a series of doors the client chooses to open, not a door that locks behind them. The analogy emphasizes ongoing choice but does not replace jurisdiction-specific reporting rules or capacity assessment.
Memory hookTrauma-informed care returns control: explain, ask, respect, reassess consent.NCLEX decision ruleFor a capable adult after sexual assault, prioritize safety, understandable options, and procedure-by-procedure consent; do not make treatment depend on police reporting or evidence collection.
Why the other choices are wrongForcing evidence collection, treating initial consent as irrevocable, or requiring a police report undermines autonomy and can increase trauma. Necessary medical treatment remains available regardless of evidence-kit participation.