A 78-year-old male client with end-stage pancreatic cancer i… | MyMerci
MyMerci — full questions and rationale, free Start for free
Assignment/Delegation/Supervision MOC
Question

A 78-year-old male client with end-stage pancreatic cancer is enrolled in inpatient hospice care. The advance directive and the chart clearly document a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) order. The client becomes apneic and pulseless. Two adult children at the bedside become distressed and demand that CPR be started immediately. Which is the priority nursing action?

Explanation
A documented DNR order is a binding clinical directive that overrides family requests for resuscitation. The legal and ethical standard is to honor the written wishes of the patient. The priority is to (a) withhold CPR, (b) provide compassionate communication and presence, (c) summon the hospice/palliative care team, and (d) support the family with bereavement resources. Option 3 violates the directive and the autonomy of the patient. Option 4 dismisses the family and compounds acute grief. Option 1 partial resuscitation is not a recognized compromise; any active resuscitative intervention contradicts the directive and is ethically inconsistent.
Next question on this topicA 67-year-old client with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease attends a routine primary …

In-depth explanation

Clinical Judgment
Apply NCJMM: Recognize cues (documented DNR + apneic and pulseless + family demanding CPR + acute grief) → Analyze cues (advance directive is binding; family request cannot override) → Generate solutions (withhold CPR + compassionate communication + hospice team + bereavement support) → Take action (no CPR, presence, summon the team, support the family) → Evaluate outcomes (autonomy honored, family supported, bereavement initiated).

Memory Tip
Patient autonomy > family wishes. A documented DNR is binding even when family demands CPR in the moment. Nurse role = honor the directive + emotional presence + summon the palliative team.

KR vs US
In Korean practice, CPR is often performed at end of life because the family demands it. In the US, advance directives and DNR orders are legally binding. NCLEX always treats written patient wishes as the priority, and partial resuscitation as a compromise is also wrong.

Clinical scenario

Clinical Practice Guide
AHA & ANA position statements + state DNR statutes: a properly executed advance directive (POLST/MOLST in many states) is legally binding. Healthcare staff must honor the directive even when family requests differ. After expected death, post-mortem care, family bereavement support, and hospice/palliative team follow-up are standard.

Caution
NCLEX traps: (1) "family insists, so do CPR" (autonomy violation), (2) "explain DNR rules and dismiss family" (lack of compassion), (3) "partial CPR as a compromise" (ethically inconsistent). The fix is always to honor the directive plus active emotional support.

Key concepts

Browse all questions No login required

Master the NCLEX-RN with MyMerci

Thousands of NCLEX-style questions with detailed rationale — in your language. Track your progress and study smarter.

Start for free
Read in another language: English한국어日本語繁體中文Tiếng Việt

For study reference only. Always follow current clinical guidelines and your institution’s protocols.