Leadership Theories and Styles | MyMerci
제안하기
0 / 2000

Leadership Theories and Styles

Unit 5 · Topic 18Leadership Theories and Styles
1.Key Concepts

Leadership is the process of influencing people toward a shared goal. Management is the process of planning, organizing, staffing, directing, and controlling resources to reach organizational goals. Every registered nurse leads — at the bedside, as a charge nurse, and in interprofessional teams — even without a management title.

ManagerLeader
Holds a formal, assigned positionMay be formal or informal (emerges from the group)
Focuses on systems, rules, budgets, and controlFocuses on people, vision, and trust
Maintains the status quo; short-term viewDrives change and innovation; long-term view
"Does things right" (how)"Does the right things" (what and why)
Authority comes from the positionInfluence comes from relationships and credibility

An effective nurse manager needs both sets of skills. A staff nurse who is respected by peers and changes practice through example is an informal leader.

Power is the capacity to influence others. The classic sources (French and Raven, later expanded) are:

  • Legitimate — from the formal position (nurse manager, charge nurse)
  • Reward — ability to give something valued (schedule preferences, recognition)
  • Coercive — ability to punish (discipline, undesirable assignments)
  • Expert — knowledge and skill (the nurse everyone asks about central lines)
  • Referent — admiration and personal identification with the leader
  • Informational — access to information others need

Expert and referent power are personal and tend to produce commitment; coercive power produces compliance at best and resentment at worst.

2.Principles & Frameworks

Trait theories ("great man" theories). Early theories held that leaders are born with traits such as intelligence, self-confidence, integrity, and drive. Limitation: traits alone do not predict effectiveness, and the theory implies leadership cannot be learned.

Behavioral theories focus on what leaders do, not who they are.

Style (Lewin)BehaviorBest fitRisk
Autocratic (authoritarian)Leader decides alone, gives orders, strong controlEmergencies, codes, disasters, inexperienced teamsLow morale and creativity if used routinely
Democratic (participative)Shared decisions, group input, "we" focusStable units, experienced staff, planning changeSlower decisions
Laissez-faire (permissive)Little direction or controlHighly skilled, self-directed experts (research teams)Confusion, low productivity on most clinical units

Managerial (leadership) grid — Blake and Mouton. Two axes rated 1–9: concern for production (task) on the horizontal axis and concern for people on the vertical axis.

Grid positionNameMeaning
1,1ImpoverishedMinimal effort on task and people
9,1Authority-compliance (task)High task, low people — efficiency above relationships
1,9Country clubHigh people, low task — comfortable but unproductive
5,5Middle of the roadBalance through compromise
9,9TeamHigh task and high people — the ideal

Contingency (situational) theories — no single style works in every situation.

  • Fiedler's contingency model: a leader's style is fairly fixed (measured with the least preferred coworker scale). Task-oriented leaders do best when the situation is very favorable or very unfavorable; relationship-oriented leaders do best in moderately favorable situations. Favorability depends on leader–member relations, task structure, and position power.
  • Hersey and Blanchard situational leadership: the leader adapts to the follower's readiness (maturity) — ability plus willingness.
Follower readinessLeader styleTask behaviorRelationship behavior
R1 — unable and unwilling or insecureS1 Telling (directing)HighLow
R2 — unable but willingS2 Selling (coaching)HighHigh
R3 — able but unwilling or insecureS3 Participating (supporting)LowHigh
R4 — able and willingS4 DelegatingLowLow
  • House's path–goal theory (built on expectancy theory): the leader clears the path to the goal. Directive — clear instructions when the task is ambiguous or staff are inexperienced; supportive — encouragement for stressful or repetitive work; participative — involving staff in decisions; achievement-oriented — challenging goals for capable staff.

Contemporary theories

TheoryCore ideaKey elements
TransactionalExchange: performance for reward, errors for correctionContingent reward, management by exception; maintains the status quo; short-term
Transformational (Burns, Bass)Inspires followers to exceed self-interest for a shared visionThe four I's: idealized influence (charisma), inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, individualized consideration
Servant (Greenleaf)Leader serves first; followers' growth and well-being come firstListening, empathy, stewardship, community building
AuthenticLeader is genuine and ethically groundedSelf-awareness, relational transparency, balanced processing, internalized moral perspective
CharismaticPersonal magnetism and conviction inspire devotionPowerful vision; risk of dependence on one person
Emotional intelligence (Goleman)Leadership depends on managing emotionsSelf-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, social skill

Transformational leadership is the first component of the ANCC Magnet Recognition Program model, alongside structural empowerment, exemplary professional practice, new knowledge and innovation, and empirical outcomes. Magnet designation is voluntary and awarded to organizations that meet these standards.

3.Application in Practice
  • Match the style to the situation. During a rapid response or code, the charge nurse uses a directive, autocratic style: clear roles, closed-loop communication, no debate. At a staff meeting about a new scheduling policy, the same nurse uses a democratic style.
  • Match the style to the follower. A new graduate on orientation needs high direction (telling or coaching); an experienced nurse precepting others can be given a delegating style.
  • Use transformational behaviors to lead change — share the "why," connect the change to patient outcomes, ask staff for solutions, recognize individual contributions.
  • Use transactional tools where they fit — clear expectations, audit results, recognition tied to specific performance (hand hygiene compliance, fall rates).
  • Build personal power through clinical expertise, reliability, and respectful communication; avoid relying on coercive power.
  • Shared governance structures (unit practice councils) let staff nurses lead practice decisions and develop leadership skills.
4.Nurse's Role & Responsibilities
  • Every registered nurse is a leader of care for assigned clients: coordinating the team, delegating appropriately, advocating, and speaking up for safety.
  • The charge nurse balances assignments, supports staff, escalates problems, and models professional behavior.
  • The nurse manager sets unit direction, develops staff, manages resources, and is accountable for outcomes and culture.
  • Leaders are responsible for self-development: seeking feedback, mentoring, continuing education, and reflecting on their own style and its effect on others.
  • Leaders role-model civility, accountability, and a just culture, where people are supported to report errors and near misses.
5.Legal & Ethical Considerations
  • Leadership does not change scope of practice: a leader cannot direct staff to act beyond what the state Nurse Practice Act and facility policy allow.
  • The ANA Code of Ethics for Nurses (2025 revision, 10 provisions) states that nurses have authority over nursing practice and are accountable for it (Provision 4); Provision 6 makes nurses, individually and collectively, responsible for the ethical environment of the work setting.
  • Leaders who ignore unsafe conditions, retaliate against staff who raise concerns, or tolerate disruptive behavior expose the organization to liability and undermine patient safety.
  • Decisions about staff (assignments, discipline, evaluations) must be fair, consistent, documented, and free of discrimination.
  • Confidentiality applies to personnel matters as well as client information.
6.Case Examples

Case 1 — Code on the unit. A client becomes unresponsive and pulseless. Several staff arrive and begin talking at once. The charge nurse asks, "What style is best?"

Correct action: autocratic (directive) leadership — assign roles clearly (compressions, airway, defibrillator, recorder, medications) and use closed-loop communication.

Why: in a crisis, speed and clarity save lives; group discussion delays care.

Case 2 — Experienced, motivated team. A group of experienced ICU nurses is developing a new early-mobility protocol and asks for autonomy.

Correct action: delegating (S4) style — provide resources and a deadline, then step back.

Why: in situational leadership, high-readiness followers (able and willing) need low task and low relationship direction.

Case 3 — New graduate lacking confidence. A new graduate nurse is capable of basic skills but anxious and unsure how to manage four clients.

Correct action: a coaching (selling, S2) approach — clear direction plus encouragement and frequent check-ins.

Why: the nurse is still building ability; withdrawing guidance (laissez-faire) is unsafe.

Case 4 — Charismatic manager leaves. A unit that ran well under a charismatic manager falls apart after she resigns.

Lesson: charismatic leadership can create dependence on one person. Transformational leaders develop followers and systems so improvement is sustained.

7.Common Pitfalls
  • Confusing transformational (vision, inspiration, individualized consideration) with transactional (contingent reward, management by exception). "Contingent reward" is always transactional.
  • Assuming democratic leadership is always best — in emergencies, autocratic is correct.
  • Reading the grid backwards: 9,1 is high task, low people; 1,9 is high people, low task.
  • Mixing up Fiedler (leader style is fixed; change the situation or the leader) with Hersey and Blanchard (the leader adapts style to follower readiness).
  • Thinking laissez-faire means "empowering" — without direction, most clinical teams become disorganized.
  • Treating a manager and a leader as the same — a manager has position power; a leader may have none but still influences.
  • Believing leadership is only for managers — staff nurses lead care every shift.
8.High-Yield Points
  • Leader = influence, vision, change; manager = position, control, systems
  • Autocratic for emergencies; democratic for stable teams and planning; laissez-faire only for self-directed experts
  • Blake and Mouton grid: 9,9 team is ideal; 9,1 = authority-compliance (task only)
  • Fiedler: task-oriented leaders best in very favorable or very unfavorable situations
  • Hersey and Blanchard: low readiness → telling; high readiness → delegating
  • Path–goal: leader clarifies the path; directive style when the task is unclear or staff are inexperienced
  • Transformational = four I's (idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, individualized consideration)
  • Transactional = contingent reward and management by exception
  • Servant leaders put followers' needs first; authentic leaders show self-awareness and transparency
  • Transformational leadership is a core component of the ANCC Magnet model
  • Expert and referent power build commitment; coercive power builds resentment

다음 이론을 계속 학습하려면 로그인하세요.

로그인하고 계속 학습
컨텐츠를 그만볼래?

필기노트, 하이라이터, 메모는 잘 쓰고 있어?

내보내줘
어떤 폴더에 저장할래?

컨텐츠 노트에는 총 0개의 폴더가 있어!

폴더 만들기
컨텐츠 만들기
만들기
신고했어요.

운영진이 검토할게요!

해당 유저를 차단했어요.

마이페이지에서 차단한 회원을 관리할 수 있어요.