Clinical Assessment in Triage
Primary Assessment
- The primary assessment follows the ABCDE approach: Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, and Exposure. This systematic approach helps identify immediate life-threatening conditions requiring urgent intervention.
- Critical physiological parameters evaluated include airway patency, respiratory rate and effort, pulse quality and rate, blood pressure, capillary refill, level of consciousness, and pupillary response.
- Assess airway patency and apply interventions if compromised
- Evaluate breathing quality, rate, and effort
- Check circulation: pulse quality, blood pressure, capillary refill
- Assess disability: AVPU scale or Glasgow Coma Scale
- Expose patient as needed to identify other injuries or conditions
Key Points
- ABCDE assessment should take less than 60-90 seconds in emergency triage
- Abnormalities in any component may warrant immediate intervention
Vital Signs Interpretation
- Vital signs provide objective data for triage decisions and must be interpreted within the context of the patient's age, presenting complaint, and baseline status. Significant deviations from normal ranges may indicate higher acuity.
- Key vital sign parameters include heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, temperature, oxygen saturation, and pain score. The shock index (heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure) can help identify early shock when >0.9.
Key Points
- Vital signs should be interpreted in context, not in isolation
- Trending vital signs over time can be more valuable than single measurements
Patients with normal vital signs may still have serious conditions. Never downgrade a triage category based solely on normal vital signs if other concerning features are present.
Pain Assessment
- Pain assessment in triage includes evaluation of intensity, quality, location, radiation, duration, and exacerbating/relieving factors. Pain is considered the "fifth vital sign" and significantly influences triage decisions.
- Standardized pain scales used in triage include the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10), Visual Analog Scale, Wong-Baker FACES Scale for children, and behavioral pain scales for non-verbal patients.
Key Points
- Severe pain (≥7/10) often warrants higher triage acuity
- Certain pain locations (chest, headache) may indicate higher acuity regardless of intensity
Clinical Scenario: Chest Pain Triage
A 62-year-old male presents to the ED with substernal chest pain (7/10) radiating to the left arm, diaphoresis, and mild shortness of breath. Vital signs: HR 92, BP 146/88, RR 20, SpO2 97% on room air, temp 98.6°F.
Triage Decision: This patient should be classified as ESI Level 2 (or equivalent high priority in other systems) due to the concerning nature of the chest pain and associated symptoms suggesting possible acute coronary syndrome. The patient requires immediate ECG and prompt provider evaluation despite relatively stable vital signs.
Special Triage Considerations
Pediatric Triage
- Pediatric triage requires age-specific assessment techniques and recognition of unique physiological parameters. Children often present with different manifestations of critical illness compared to adults.
- Key considerations include age-appropriate vital sign ranges, the Pediatric Assessment Triangle (appearance, work of breathing, circulation), and developmental stage assessment. The Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) may be incorporated to identify deteriorating children.
Key Points
- Children compensate physiologically until sudden decompensation
- Parental concern is a validated predictor of serious illness
Pediatric Vital Signs Memory Aid: "The Rule of 4s"
For a 4-year-old child:
- Respiratory Rate: ~24 breaths/minute
- Heart Rate: ~100 beats/minute (80-120 range)
- Systolic BP: ~90 mmHg (80-100 range)
- Weight (kg): ~16 kg (4 × 4)
For each year of age, add or subtract 4 from these baseline values as appropriate.
Geriatric Triage
- Geriatric patients require special consideration during triage due to atypical presentations of serious conditions, multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy, and altered physiological responses. Subtle changes in mental status may be the only indication of serious illness.
- Key considerations include baseline functional status, cognitive assessment, fall risk, medication review, and social support evaluation. The Identification of Seniors At Risk (ISAR) tool can help identify elderly patients at higher risk for adverse outcomes.
Key Points
- Older adults often present with vague or atypical symptoms
- Consider higher acuity for geriatric patients with altered mental status
Geriatric patients with infections may not present with fever. Confusion, falls, or functional decline may be the only presenting symptoms of serious infection.
Mental Health Triage
- Mental health triage requires assessment of both psychological and safety risks. Key components include suicide risk assessment, homicidal ideation, psychosis evaluation, substance use screening, and assessment of ability to care for self.
- Specialized tools like the SAD PERSONS Scale for suicide risk or the Mental Health Triage Scale may be used to standardize assessment and determine appropriate acuity levels.
Key Points
- Safety of patient and staff is the primary concern
- Always assess for medical causes of psychiatric symptoms
Mass Casualty Triage
- Mass casualty triage differs from daily ED triage, focusing on doing the greatest good for the greatest number rather than providing optimal care to each individual. The goal shifts to identifying salvageable patients who need immediate intervention.
- Common systems include START (Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment), JumpSTART (pediatric adaptation), SALT (Sort, Assess, Lifesaving interventions, Treatment/Transport), and MASS (Move, Assess, Sort, Send).
START Triage Categories Memory Aid: "The 4 Rs"
- Red (Immediate): Requires immediate life-saving intervention
- Yellow (Delayed): Requires intervention but can wait
- Green (Minor): Requires minimal treatment, "walking wounded"
- Black (Deceased/Expectant): Deceased or unlikely to survive given resources
Key Points
- Mass casualty triage focuses on resource allocation, not individual optimal care
- Requires frequent reassessment as resources and patient conditions change